This article is from the Apple II Csa2 FAQ, by Jeff Hurlburt with numerous contributions by others.
This is just to give you a rough estimate of how much faster you might be able to achieve... BenchMark v5.0 results: CPU Stock TWGS TWGS TWGS ZipGS ZipGS ZipGS Version ROM 01 1.8s 1.8s 1.8s 1.0.2 1.0.2 1.0.2 Cache/Spd 32k/15 32k/15 32k/15 64k/?? 64k/?? 64k/?? Clock Spd 2.8 15 13.75 12.5 16 15 14 ======= ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== Sieve 410.00 99.00 108.00 117.00 98.00 99.00 110.00 String 1151.20 270.00 292.00 303.67 259.00 262.00 282.00 Float 1 472.00 92.33 87.00 111.33 123.00 128.00 135.00 Float 2 1535.00 317.00 394.00 381.67 395.00 415.00 432.00 Fibinacci 2006.00 605.00 634.00 645.33 507.00 523.00 548.00 Integer 1553.40 307.00 330.00 346.67 420.00 431.00 443.00 Dhrystone 236 1136 1063 1000 NA NA NA * 1351 1183 1282 NA NA * Dhrystone v1.1 re-compiled under ORCA/C v2.0.1 System Software 5.0 QuickDraw II improvement test: Stock //gs: 5648 ticks TWGS 15 MHz: 1332 ticks (over 4x faster than stock) If you look at the numbers, a 12 MHz or faster TWGS/Zip will make everything just about 4x faster than a stock //gs. By: Scott G.
 
Continue to: