lotus

previous page: 45  Is there really no alternative to listening tests? (MPEG Audio Layer-3 Applications)
  
page up: MPEG FAQ
  
next page: 47  Very interesting! Tell me more about this recommendation! (MPEG Audio Layer-3 Applications)

46 O.K., back to these listening tests. Come on, tell me some results. (MPEG Audio Layer-3 Applications)




Description

This article is from the MPEG FAQ, by Frank Gadegast phade@cs.tu-berlin.de with numerous contributions by others.

46 O.K., back to these listening tests. Come on, tell me some results. (MPEG Audio Layer-3 Applications)

Well, for details you should study one of those AES papers or MPEG
documents listed above. The main result is that for low bitrates (64 kbps
per channel or below), Layer-3 always scored significantly better than
Layer-2. Another important conclusion is the draft recommendation of the
task group TG 10/2 within the ITU-R. It recommends the use of low bit-
rate audio coding schemes for digital sound-broadcasting applications
(doc. BS.1115).

 

Continue to:













TOP
previous page: 45  Is there really no alternative to listening tests? (MPEG Audio Layer-3 Applications)
  
page up: MPEG FAQ
  
next page: 47  Very interesting! Tell me more about this recommendation! (MPEG Audio Layer-3 Applications)