This article is from the Lawful Arrest/Search/Seizure FAQ, by Ahimsa Dhamapada ahimsa@mu.clarityconnect.net with numerous contributions by others.
I bet you didn't know this!
"At Law" means "governed by the rules of law", as opposed
to the rules of "equity" (contracts). An "Attorney at Law"
is by definition an "officer of the court". He essentially
works for the court. He is granted the right to work by
permission of the court, in the jurisdiction of the court.
Is such a man without bias? Can such a man defend you properly!?
NO!
A very interesting topic to research on your own:
The is evidence to suggest that the United States is
still under British rule. Evidence? Many or most
lawyers use the title "Esquire", which is a title of
the English gentry. Like "Count", or "Knight", etc. it is
granted by the reigning Monarch. The use of such a title
in a court is evidence that the Constitution is being
subverted, replaced by the King's Law. The English Gentry
believe that the people are not sovereign, but the Monarch
is.
David Dodge has uncovered a very interesting fact:
there appears to be a missing Amendment of Constitution,
and may have been properly ratified. It is the so-called
"Titles of Nobility" amendment, and it appears to forbid
lawyers from serving in public office. It would have
been the 13th Amendment. If you search the internet you should
be able to find his research, or check out the back issues
of the Anti-Shyster.
This topic has been known to get lawyers pretty agitated:
> The usual crap 'bout the "Titles of Nobility Amendment"
> which was not ratified and would do nothing of the
> sort. For a comprehensive look at the bizarre myths
> some hate groups have created about this "amendment":
> http://www.nyx.net/~jsilvers/nobility.html Clear sign
> that the poster/author of this "FAQ" is a nutjob.
>
> -- tennish@my-deja.com (quoted in news:misc.legal)
"Hate Groups". I guess "tennish" wasn't paying attention when
we were speaking about non-violence, huh? ;^)
 
Continue to: