lotus

previous page: 1.16 Okay, how do we plan a first meeting?
  
page up: Internet Personals: Advice for Gay Men FAQ
  
next page: 2.2 With the current configuration, how may we make better use of the cluttered space in the alt.personals. newsgroups?

2.1 Why aren't there separate USENET groups for straight and for gay people, men looking for women, men looking for men, women looking for women, etc.?

Headaches Begone! A Systemic Approach To Healing Your Headaches Book



Description

This article is from the Internet Personals: Advice for Gay Men FAQ, by Fred Young nssf@greatwildwest.net and Dean Esmay esmay@syndicomm.com with numerous contributions by others.

2.1 Why aren't there separate USENET groups for straight and for gay people, men looking for women, men looking for men, women looking for women, etc.?

This comes up periodically. Frankly, it strikes me as a fine idea.
However, some people are against it, some sites would not carry
groups for "members of the same sex" (motss), leaving them with
nowhere to post.

On the other hand, with the high traffic and multiple cross posts
we see in the alt.personals.* groups, it makes lots of sense to
separate the categories.

Ultimately I'm not sure exactly where I stand, but if you're
really interested in seeing something like this happen, write up a
proposal and bring it to the alt.config newsgroup for discussion.
Arguing about it anywhere else is pointless.

 

Continue to:

Free Sex Improvement Training at ExperientialSexLab.com









TOP
previous page: 1.16 Okay, how do we plan a first meeting?
  
page up: Internet Personals: Advice for Gay Men FAQ
  
next page: 2.2 With the current configuration, how may we make better use of the cluttered space in the alt.personals. newsgroups?