This article is from the Crosswords FAQ, by James A. Lundon (jlundon@xstacy.enet.dec.com) with numerous contributions by others.
Note: I have strong opinions on this topic, vis a vis the necessity of a
clue having a surface reading.
*My* definition of good surface reading in a clue is:
something (the clue) you could say, or have said in the past, in
conversation and not something, while syntactically and semantically
possible, means nothing.
Tovah Hollander said:
My first-pass definition of acceptable surface reading would be: would
this clue make sense to someone who doesn't know anything about cryptic
clues? (Not "make sense as a clue", but simply "mean something
sensible".)
Better definitions are welcome?
 
Continue to: