lotus

previous page: 7.2.13) When I call SSLRead(), on returning, the length argument should be replaced with the number of bytes actually read. In practice, this doesn't seem to be happening. What am I doing wrong? (SSL Plus)
  
page up: Secure Sockets Layer Discussion List FAQ
  
next page: 7.3.1) Where is the SSLeay FAQ?

7.2.14) If session cache is stored in a database, can multiple Unix processes share the same session data? (SSL Plus)




Description

This article is from the Secure Sockets Layer Discussion List FAQ, by Shannon Appel SAppel@consensus.com with numerous contributions by others.

7.2.14) If session cache is stored in a database, can multiple Unix processes share the same session data? (SSL Plus)

There is no information stored in the session database which can't
be passed between processes. Specifically, there is no pointer
indirection. Of course, you'll have to figure out how to pass
session database records (and their changes or deletions) between
processes; that is not part of SSL Plus.

 

Continue to:













TOP
previous page: 7.2.13) When I call SSLRead(), on returning, the length argument should be replaced with the number of bytes actually read. In practice, this doesn't seem to be happening. What am I doing wrong? (SSL Plus)
  
page up: Secure Sockets Layer Discussion List FAQ
  
next page: 7.3.1) Where is the SSLeay FAQ?