lotus

previous page: 6-8. How long has this been going on? (Cryonics)
  
page up: Cryonics FAQ
  
next page: 6-10. How can uncooperative relatives derail suspensions? (Cryonics)

6-9. How much of the resources of the cryonics organizations are reserved for reviving patients?




Description

This article is from the Cryonics FAQ, by Tim Freeman tim@infoscreen.com with numerous contributions by others.

6-9. How much of the resources of the cryonics organizations are reserved for reviving patients?

Alcor's approach to this is discussed in detail in CRFT page
A-36. They compute the costs of liquid nitrogen, dewar maintenance,
rent, etc., per year. The amount of the trust fund for each patient
is twice the amount necessary to pay for this indefinitely assuming
a 2% return on investment after inflation. The doubling
mentioned in the previous sentence is to provide a margin for error
and funds for revival.

Assuming that the costs of storage do not change, and a 2%
return on investment, and the most efficient storage for a
neurosuspension patient, the value of the fund in 1991 dollars y
years after suspension is

$3300 + ($3300 * (1.02 ^ y))

The corresponding figures for the least efficient storage for a
whole-body patient are

$84357 + ($84357 * (1.02 ^ y))

Alcor's minimum fee for suspension and storage does not depend on how
they are going to do the storage, so it isn't clear to me how the
numbers derived in CRFT page A-36 should compare to Alcor's suspension
minimums.

 

Continue to:













TOP
previous page: 6-8. How long has this been going on? (Cryonics)
  
page up: Cryonics FAQ
  
next page: 6-10. How can uncooperative relatives derail suspensions? (Cryonics)