stason.org logo lotus


previous page: 45  Is there really no alternative to listening tests? (MPEG Audio Layer-3 Applications)page up: MPEG FAQnext page: 47  Very interesting! Tell me more about this recommendation! (MPEG Audio Layer-3 Applications)

46 O.K., back to these listening tests. Come on, tell me some results. (MPEG Audio Layer-3 Applications)

 Books
 TULARC
















Description

This article is from the MPEG FAQ, by Frank Gadegast phade@cs.tu-berlin.de with numerous contributions by others.

46 O.K., back to these listening tests. Come on, tell me some results. (MPEG Audio Layer-3 Applications)

Well, for details you should study one of those AES papers or MPEG
documents listed above. The main result is that for low bitrates (64 kbps
per channel or below), Layer-3 always scored significantly better than
Layer-2. Another important conclusion is the draft recommendation of the
task group TG 10/2 within the ITU-R. It recommends the use of low bit-
rate audio coding schemes for digital sound-broadcasting applications
(doc. BS.1115).

 

Continue to:


Share and Enjoy

Bookmark this story so others can enjoy it:
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Wists

Tags

pc, MPEG, compression, video, audio, mp3, layers, bitstream, software, books, publications, technology, standard, shareware, free







TOP
previous page: 45  Is there really no alternative to listening tests? (MPEG Audio Layer-3 Applications)page up: MPEG FAQnext page: 47  Very interesting! Tell me more about this recommendation! (MPEG Audio Layer-3 Applications)