![]() |
![]() |
Articles / TULARC / Macintosh Operating Systems / MachTen & CodeBuilder / | ![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
21 What commercial applications run on MachTen? |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
This article is from the MachTen & CodeBuilder FAQ, by Jaime Julca jjulca@tenon.com with numerous contributions by others.
While hundreds of public domain applictions have been ported to MachTen,
commercial vendors have been less enthusiastic. Initially vendors directed
their attention toward A/UX. Not that A/UX no longer exists and Rhapsody is
on the horizon, vendors may become more receptive. A port to MachTen would
easily transition to Rhapsody.
 
Continue to:
os, MachTen, hardware, software, CodeBuilder, Tenon Intersystems, Macintosh
![]() |
|
|