![]() |
![]() |
Articles / TULARC / Languages / English / | ![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
32 "company is" vs "company are" (Usage disputes - alt.usage.english) |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
This article is from the alt.usage.english FAQ, by Mark Israel misrael@scripps.edu with numerous contributions by others.
Use of a plural verb after a singular noun denoting a group of
persons (known as a noun of multitude) is commoner in the U.K. than
in the U.S. Fowler wrote: ""The Cabinet "is" divided" is better,
because in the order of thought a whole must precede division; and
"The Cabinet "are" agreed" is better, because it takes two or more
to agree."
 
Continue to:
languages, english, usage disputes, punctuation, word origins, phrase origins, spelling
![]() |
|
|