![]() |
![]() |
Articles / TULARC / Education / Star Trek Tech / | ![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
124 "Ha! Three nacelle ships are canon!" ("All Good Things..." [TNG]) (Warp and Subspace - Star Trek) |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
This article is from the Star Trek Tech FAQ, by Joshua Bell inexorabletash@hotmail.com with numerous contributions by others.
Note that a number of things have changed by the time we see the
U.S.S. Enterprise zipping around with three nacelles in that episode:
* Warp 13 is a common cruising speed
* Warp is no longer damaging space-time
* New nacelle designs are being used on other ships
My own explanation: new nacelle designs allow ships like the U.S.S.
Pasteur to cruise at Warp 13 without frying space-time. Older ships,
like the Enterprise, can be refitted with a third nacelle (and other
wingdings and widgets) to clean their subspace emissions, so to speak.
The third nacelle also allows a more powerful field to be generated,
to drive the ship around at Warp 13, but this goes beyond TNG-era
knowledge of subspace mechanics.
So as far as strictly TNG-era ships are concerned, three nacelles are
still worse than useless.
 
Continue to:
reading, books, Star Trek, holodeck, computers, ship statistics, transporters, replicators, phasing, warp, subspace, warp velocities
![]() |
|
|